about.me launched in 2009 as a one-page "digital business card." It's still around, still charging $5 to $7.50 a month, and still doing more or less what it did the year the iPad shipped: a photo, a headline, a few links, and a paragraph about who you are. Nothing on that page can tell a recruiter whether you actually ship code.
The short answer: the best about.me alternative for developers is a profile built around live, verifiable data instead of a paragraph you typed once. about.me gives you a static bio with an AI chat widget and appointment scheduling bolted on. DevBio gives you a bio where GitHub stars, commit history, and revenue update themselves, because they're read live from GitHub and your payment provider instead of stored as text.
Updated July 2026.
That distinction is worth more in 2026 than it was a decade ago, for a reason that has nothing to do with design trends. AI has made confident, well-written claims cheap to produce, and 67% of hiring managers now say AI-generated resumes are actively hurting their ability to trust what they read, according to Forbes. A bio page that can't be checked against anything real is exactly the format that crisis is undermining.
What about.me Actually Gets Right#
Credit where it's due. about.me isn't a bad product for what it's built to do.
It's genuinely fast to set up. A page with a photo, a one-line bio, and a handful of links takes a few minutes, no code required.
The free tier is real, not a bait-and-switch. You get a working page at
about.me/yournamewith a shareable link and an email-signature badge at no cost.Pro adds real tools for client-facing professionals: appointment scheduling synced to Google Calendar, lead capture into a CRM, and a "Virtual Twin AI" chat widget that answers visitor questions on your behalf, per about.me's own pricing page.
The Pro plan supports a small portfolio — up to 30 photos or videos with captions — plus Google Analytics access and a custom domain.
If you're a consultant, coach, or realtor who wants one link for scheduling calls and capturing leads, that feature set is coherent and reasonably priced. The problems start the moment you try to use the same page to prove you're a developer worth hiring.
It's also worth being honest about what a link-in-bio page can and can't do for you regardless of which tool builds it. Typical click-through rates on a bio link sit around 1-3%, meaning a profile getting 1,000 visits a week converts to roughly 10-30 clicks on whatever you're pointing people toward. That ceiling is a traffic problem, not a proof problem — no amount of scheduling widgets or AI chat bubbles changes how many people click through. What a better bio can change is what happens in the seconds after someone does click: whether they land on a paragraph asking to be believed, or a page showing them something they can check themselves.
The Generalist Profile Trap#
Here's the direct problem: about.me is built to serve every profession equally, which means it's built to serve none of them well — and for developers specifically, that gap is a real cost. Call it the Generalist Profile Trap: a tool designed to fit a real estate agent, a life coach, and a software engineer with the same three features ends up proving nothing about the one thing that actually matters for the engineer — shipped, checkable work.
Look at where about.me's product investment has actually gone. Appointment scheduling. Lead capture into a CRM. An AI chat widget that fields questions from visitors. Every one of those is a feature for someone selling a service and booking calls. None of them touch code, commits, or revenue from a SaaS product — the exact proof points a developer's audience is actually looking for.
That's not a small gap. More than one new developer joins GitHub every second, and the platform crossed 180 million developers and 630 million repositories in the past year, per GitHub's 2025 Octoverse report. Every one of those developers can spin up an about.me page with the same photo-plus-bio template you're using. What separates you from the other 180 million isn't a nicer headline — it's whether anything on your page can be verified without asking you to.
As developer Lucas Lima do Nascimento put it in a DEV Community post on personal branding: "Your brand is not just about how you present yourself, but also how others perceive you." A generic bio you wrote yourself is entirely self-presentation. It has no mechanism for the other half — the part where someone can independently confirm what you're claiming is true.
about.me vs DevBio: Feature-by-Feature#
Stripped down to what actually differs between the two:
about.me | DevBio | |
|---|---|---|
Page type | Static bio with AI chat + scheduling | Composable developer bio, live-rendered |
GitHub stats | Not supported | Live stars, commits, and contribution heatmap |
Revenue / MRR | Not supported | Live MRR from Stripe, Dodo Payments, Lemon Squeezy, or Polar |
Portfolio | Up to 30 manually uploaded photos/videos (Pro) | Project cards that pull live data automatically |
Resume export | None built in | ATS-readable PDF at |
Analytics | Google Analytics access (Pro only) | Live visitor analytics + globe view, built in |
Custom domain | Yes, on Pro ($7.50/mo) | Yes, on Pro |
Sell a project | Not supported | Built-in marketplace with live-MRR listings |
Built for | Consultants, coaches, client-facing professionals | Developers who need to prove their work is real |
The tradeoff is honest: about.me wins if you need appointment scheduling and lead capture for client work. DevBio wins on everything that involves proving a claim is current, because those things read from a live source instead of a form you filled in once. If you're comparing other link-in-bio options too, see how the same tradeoff plays out in the Linktree alternative and the Bento.me alternative comparisons. If you want to see your own GitHub stars and commits rendered live instead of typed in, connect your account and check the free tier.
What about.me Can't Show: Live GitHub Stats and Real Revenue#
about.me has no GitHub integration at all — not a badge, not a link preview, nothing pulled from your account. If you want visitors to see your commit activity, your only option is typing a sentence about it or pasting a raw GitHub URL into your links list.
DevBio resolves this at read time instead of write time. Every time your bio page loads, it queries your connected GitHub account and any connected payment provider, then merges live stars, commit counts, and MRR onto your project cards and revenue component. Your bio content itself is never mutated with those numbers — they're layered on live, so there's no stale snapshot sitting on the page from three months ago.
This matters more than it looks like it should, because most of a developer's real output is invisible by default. Developers pushed nearly a billion commits in 2025, up 25.1% year over year, and 81.5% of all contributions now happen in private repositories, per the same Octoverse 2025 report. A private-repo contribution heatmap can surface that activity without exposing a single line of client code. A sentence on an about.me page can't reach into that private activity at all — it can only assert it. If you want the deeper mechanics of what a heatmap actually communicates, see the GitHub contribution heatmap guide.
The 2025 Stack Overflow Developer Survey, with 49,000+ responses across 177 countries, lists portfolio projects and real-world problem-solving as top hiring priorities, with GitHub now the most desired collaboration tool among developers surveyed. Hiring managers are already looking at GitHub directly. A profile that surfaces that same data live, instead of asking them to go dig for it separately, is doing work a static about.me page structurally can't.
Resume Export: A Screenshot vs. an ATS-Ready PDF#
Recruiters still ask for a PDF, and about.me doesn't generate one. Its Pro plan lets you embed an intro video and upload portfolio photos, but there's no path from your about.me page to a document an applicant tracking system can parse. Your options are a screenshot (unreadable to any ATS) or a completely separate resume you maintain by hand.
DevBio compiles a real, text-based PDF at /{username}/resume by converting each bio component into LaTeX and rendering it server-side. It's selectable text an ATS parses the same way it parses a Word document, generated from the same components already on your public bio. Update the bio once, and both the live page and the resume PDF stay in sync — no separate document to remember. This is the same split covered in more depth in the ATS-ready developer resume guide: the artifact a machine reads and the artifact a human watches should never be the same file, and neither should require manual upkeep to stay current.
Analytics: A Paid Add-On vs. Built In From Day One#
about.me treats visitor data as a premium feature. Google Analytics access only unlocks on the $7.50/month Pro plan, and even then it's a generic dashboard bolted onto a page that wasn't designed to be analyzed — traffic sources and demographics, not the specific signal a developer actually wants, which is whether the people looking at your profile are the recruiters and hiring managers you're trying to reach.
DevBio treats visitor analytics as part of the core product rather than an upsell: a live globe view of where visitors are connecting from, real-time visitor counts, and per-link click tracking, available without stitching together a third-party analytics account. For the mechanics of what that looks like in practice, see developer bio analytics. The difference isn't just cost — it's that one platform assumes analyzing your own traffic is optional, and the other assumes you'll want to know who's actually looking at your proof-of-work the moment they land.
This also plays into a comparison developers increasingly have to make. LinkedIn already gives you a recruiter-facing profile with built-in reach; the question is what a standalone bio adds on top of that. The DevBio vs. LinkedIn comparison goes through that tradeoff in more detail — the short version is that LinkedIn is where recruiters search, and a live developer profile is where they verify what they found.
Pricing and Total Cost#
about.me's current pricing, straight from its own pricing page: Free ($0, a basic page and one link), Standard ($5/month or $60/year, adds the Virtual Twin AI and lead capture), and Pro ($7.50/month or $90/year, adds a custom domain, portfolio uploads, intro video, and Google Analytics access).
DevBio's Free plan covers up to 8 projects and 2 integrations. Pro runs $2/month or $12/year and adds custom domains, up to 30 projects, 10 integrations, hourly data sync, and private-repo GitHub support — plus a $39 one-time founding-member offer for lifetime Pro access, capped at the first 100 seats. At full price, about.me's Pro tier costs 7.5x what DevBio's Pro tier costs annually, for a page that still can't show a single live GitHub stat. See the current founding-member offer before the 100 seats are gone.
Before and After: Two Developers, Same Experience#
Picture two backend developers with near-identical resumes, both freelancing part-time alongside full-time roles.
Developer A built an about.me page two years ago. It has a headshot, a two-sentence bio, and links to three side projects — one of which was sunset eight months ago but is still listed, because updating the page means logging back into an editor she hasn't opened since she built it. A recruiter reading the page has no way to tell which claims are current.
Developer B runs a DevBio profile. The same two-year-old side project either shows a live "archived" state or simply isn't linked anymore, because it's a component tied to a real repo, not a paragraph someone has to remember to edit. Her active project shows a live star count and, since it charges a small subscription, a live MRR figure pulled straight from Stripe. Nothing on the page has to be remembered or revisited — it reflects this week by default.
Same skill level, same years of experience. One profile silently drifts out of date the moment its owner stops thinking about it. The other can't, because it isn't reciting your work from memory — it's reading it. See what your own GitHub and revenue data would look like live before you decide which developer you'd rather be.
The 15-Minute about.me-to-DevBio Migration Checklist#
If you're moving off about.me, this order avoids rework:
Copy your current about.me bio text and links so you're not rewriting from scratch
Create your DevBio profile and add the basic-info, avatar, and about components first
Connect your GitHub account to enable live stats and the contribution heatmap
Add your projects as components, then connect Stripe, Dodo Payments, Lemon Squeezy, or Polar to anything with real revenue
Rebuild your links list from about.me's link block
Point your custom domain at DevBio if you had one on about.me's Pro plan
Check
/{username}/resumeto confirm your ATS PDF renders correctlyUpdate your email signature link, then retire the old about.me page
For a broader look at which components are worth including beyond a photo and a paragraph, see what to put on a developer bio and the 4-layer developer personal brand playbook.
When about.me Is Still the Right Call#
This post is making the case for a live developer profile, but about.me isn't wrong for everyone. It's still the better tool if:
You're a consultant, coach, or client-facing professional who needs appointment scheduling and lead capture more than proof of technical work
You want an AI chat widget answering visitor questions on your behalf
You have no GitHub activity, shipped code, or revenue to verify in the first place, and a simple photo-plus-bio page is genuinely all you need
If none of those describe you and the page is meant to represent you as a developer, the Generalist Profile Trap works against you every day the page sits there proving nothing you couldn't have typed about anyone.
Frequently Asked Questions#
Is about.me good for developers?#
about.me works for developers who mainly need a simple, fast link-in-bio page with no ongoing data to show. It's a weaker fit as a professional developer profile, since it has no GitHub integration and can't verify code, revenue, or project activity without manual updates.
What is the best about.me alternative for developers?#
The best about.me alternative for developers is a platform that pulls GitHub stats and revenue data live instead of relying on a typed bio. DevBio does this by resolving live GitHub and payment-provider data onto your bio every time it's viewed.
Is about.me free?#
Yes. about.me's Free plan gives you a basic page at about.me/yourname with one link and an email-signature badge at no cost. Removing limits and adding scheduling, lead capture, a custom domain, or analytics requires the Standard ($5/month) or Pro ($7.50/month) plans.
Can about.me show GitHub stats or live revenue?#
No. about.me has no GitHub integration and no way to display live MRR or subscriber counts. You can only add a raw link to your GitHub profile or type a sentence describing your work.
Does about.me support custom domains?#
Yes, on the Pro plan ($7.50/month or $90/year), which also adds portfolio uploads, Google Analytics, and an intro video embed. Most competing developer-bio platforms, including DevBio, support custom domains on their paid tier too.
Can I sell a side project through about.me?#
No. about.me has no marketplace, no buyer discovery, and no way to verify the revenue on a project you describe. A platform with a built-in marketplace and live MRR data gives a buyer something to actually check.
Can about.me generate an ATS-ready resume PDF?#
No. about.me has no resume export feature at all. You'd need a separate document maintained by hand. Some developer-bio platforms compile an ATS-readable PDF resume directly from the same profile data shown on the live page.
The Bottom Line#
about.me is a coherent product for what it's actually built for: a fast, generic bio page for client-facing professionals who need scheduling and lead capture more than proof of technical work. That's the wrong toolset for a developer profile in a hiring market where 67% of hiring managers already distrust unverified claims and where most of a developer's real output sits in private repos a static page can't reach.
Three things to act on this week: stop treating your bio as a paragraph you write once and forget, connect the accounts (GitHub, your payment provider) that can actually verify what you're claiming, and make sure whatever page you send a recruiter generates an ATS-safe resume from the same data instead of a second document you maintain by hand.
Your code and your revenue already prove what you can do. Put them on one link, live.
